Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) vs Rimac Nevera
The Rimac Nevera leads on fast-charge peak and 0–62 mph.
SUV
675km · name as listed in Chinese
No US price yet
48/100#172 of 434 · Everyday
Coupé
Nevera
No US price yet
48/100#68 of 87 · Everyday
Who's ahead - and by how much?
Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)NeveraRimac Nevera
- Range
Different test cycles - not compared.
- Fast-charge peak- best on this row+428 kW· 594%
- 0–62 mphlower is better- best on this row5.5 s quicker· 75%
- Cargo space- best on this row+32.9 cu ft· 939%
- Power- best on this row+1,108 kW· 369%
- Efficiencylower is better- best on this row24 kWh/100 mi faster· 50%
Every spec side by side
| Spec | Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) | Rimac Nevera |
|---|---|---|
| Range and efficiency | ||
| Range (WLTP) | no data | |
| Range (CLTC) | no data | |
| Efficiency lower is better | - best on this row | |
| Battery | ||
| Charging | ||
| Fast-charge peak | - best on this row | |
| AC charging | no data | |
| Performance | ||
| 0–62 mph lower is better | - best on this row | |
| 0–60 mph lower is better | no data | |
| Power | - best on this row | |
| Torque | - best on this row | |
| Top speed | - best on this row | |
| Drive | ||
| Space and size | ||
| Cargo space | - best on this row | |
| Front trunk | no data | |
| Seats | ||
| Length | ||
| Width | ||
| Height | ||
| Wheelbase | ||
| Battery and warranty | ||
| Battery warranty | no data | |
| Cell chemistry | ||
| Equipment | ||
| Heat pump | ||
| Vehicle-to-load (V2L) | no data | |
Which one suits you?
Pick the Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) if
Score by category
out of 100
Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)Rimac Nevera
Range
91- Different test cycles - not compared.86Charging
090Performance
55100Practicality
800
How much is each in the US?
No US prices yet for either car
US EV incentivesQuestions
Which goes further on a charge?
Range
- Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)
- CLTC
- Rimac Nevera
- WLTP
- Ahead by
- Different tests
Which charges faster?
Rimac NeveraNevera
Fast-charge peak
- Leader
- Rimac Nevera
- Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)
- Rimac Nevera
- Ahead by
- 428 kW
Which is quicker?
Rimac NeveraNevera
0–62 mph
- Leader
- Rimac Nevera
- Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)
- Rimac Nevera
- Ahead by
- 5.5 s
Where next
- Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)Full specs, prices by trim, sourcesOpen card
- Rimac NeveraFull specs, prices by trim, sourcesOpen card
Compare with others
Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) vs
Where the numbers come from
11 sources
Every source link (12)
- https://www.miit.gov.cn/jgsj/zbys/wjfb/art/2026/art_9fa19a953e2b485e8c8e8da67b207d65.html
- https://turavto.com/zh/cars/brand-1146/models/118120
- https://www.autohome.com.cn/config/spec/76557.html?from=m&platform-key=pc&pvareaid=3290231
- https://car.m.autohome.com.cn/config/series/8171.html
- https://www.evlook.com/tai7/peizhi
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/48341.shtml
- https://cloudfront.rimac-automobili.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/20171226/Nevera_Technical-specifications.pdf
- https://www.caranddriver.com/rimac/nevera
- https://rimac-automobili.com/nevera/
- https://insideevs.com/news/559860/rimac-nevera-ionity-charger-333kw/
- https://www.rimac-automobili.com/nevera/
- https://www.arenaev.com/rimac_nevera_120kwh_2021-specs-240.php