SuliHuliSuliHuli

NIO ET7 vs Rimac Nevera

The NIO ET7 leads on range (WLTP). The Rimac Nevera leads on fast-charge peak and 0⁠–⁠62 mph.

NIO ET7

NIOET7

Sedan

NIO ET7 100 kWh (China)

1 of 2 versions

No US price yet

46/100#209 of 434 · Everyday

Coupé

Nevera

No US price yet

48/100#68 of 87 · Everyday

Who's ahead - and by how much?

ET7NIO ET7NeveraRimac Nevera
  • Range (WLTP)
    - best on this row
    +56 mi· 19%
  • Fast-charge peak
    - best on this row
    +373 kW· 294%
  • 0⁠–⁠62 mphlower is better
    - best on this row
    2 s quicker· 52%
  • Cargo space
    - best on this row
    +9.3 cu ft· 266%
  • Battery warranty
    - best on this row
    +2 years· 25%
  • AC charging
    - best on this row
    +11 kW· 100%
Every spec side by side

Every spec side by side

SpecNIO ET7Rimac Nevera
Range and efficiency
Range (WLTP) - best on this row
Range (CLTC)no data
Efficiency lower is better30.6 kWh/100 miWLTPversion: 100 kWh Long Range BatteryWLTP
Battery
Charging
Fast-charge peak - best on this row
10–80% charge lower is better29 / 30 / 40 minno data
AC charging - best on this row
DC portno data
Performance
0⁠–⁠62 mph lower is better - best on this row
0⁠–⁠60 mph lower is betterno data
Powerversion: 150 kWh Ultralong Range Battery
Torque - best on this row
Top speed - best on this row
Drive
Space and size
Cargo space - best on this row
Seats5
Length200.8 in
Width78.2 in
Height59.4 in
Wheelbase120.5 in
Ground clearanceno data
Weightversion: 100 kWh - 5 Sitzeno data
Battery and warranty
Battery warranty - best on this row
Cell chemistry
Equipment
Heat pumpno data
Vehicle-to-load (V2L)no data

Which one suits you?

Score by category

out of 100

NIO ET7Rimac Nevera
  • Range

  • Charging

  • Performance

  • Practicality

How much is each in the US?

No US prices yet for either car

US EV incentives

Questions

Which goes further on a charge?

NIO ET7ET7

Range (WLTP)

Leader
NIO ET7
NIO ET7
WLTP
Rimac Nevera
WLTP
Ahead by
56 mi

Which charges faster?

Rimac NeveraNevera

Fast-charge peak

Leader
Rimac Nevera
NIO ET7
Rimac Nevera
Ahead by
373 kW

Which is quicker?

Rimac NeveraNevera

0⁠–⁠62 mph

Leader
Rimac Nevera
NIO ET7
Rimac Nevera
Ahead by
2 s

Where next

All EVs by overall score

Compare with others

Where the numbers come from

Checked May 19, 2026 · 23 sources

HostRoleSource rankFiguresChecked
nio.comOEMprimary9Aug 12, 2026
nio.cnOEM, reviewprimary4Oct 23, 2026
discodata.eea.europa.euregulatorprimary1Aug 30, 2026
fueleconomy.govregulatorprimary1Oct 21, 2026
miit.gov.cnregulatorprimary1Jul 26, 2026
car.autohome.com.cnreviewsecondary2Nov 8, 2026
rimac-automobili.comreviewsecondary2Nov 8, 2026
adac.dereviewsecondary1Sep 18, 2026
arenaev.comreviewsecondary1Oct 23, 2026
caranddriver.comreviewsecondary1Oct 21, 2026
carnewschina.comreviewsecondary1Sep 18, 2026
cdn-public.nio.comreviewsecondary1Sep 18, 2026
cloudfront.rimac-automobili.comreviewsecondary1Nov 4, 2026
electrifying.comreviewsecondary1May 15, 2026
euroncap.comreviewsecondary1Sep 18, 2026
heise.denewssecondary1May 19, 2026
insideevs.comreviewsecondary1Nov 4, 2026
sec.govreviewsecondary1Sep 18, 2026
www-cdn.eu.nio.comreviewsecondary1Sep 18, 2026
xchuxing.comreviewsecondary1Oct 5, 2026
en.wikipedia.orgaggregatorother1May 15, 2026
kfz-handbuch.dereviewother1May 19, 2026
youtube.comaggregatorother1Jun 15, 2026
Every source link (36)
How we collect and verify