Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT) vs Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
The Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT) leads on 10–80% charge. The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV leads on cargo space.
Sedan
2026 640 · name as listed in Chinese
China · checked Oct 21, 2026 · galaxy-geely.com
81/100#58 of 421 · Everyday
SUV
2027 Mercedes-Benz EQS 400 4MATIC SUV
1 of 8 versions
Maker's price (MSRP), US
74/100#24 of 87 · Everyday
Who's ahead - and by how much?
TT (银河TT)Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT)EQS SUVMercedes-Benz EQS SUV
- Range
Different test cycles - not compared.
- 10–80% chargelower is better- best on this row19 min faster· 61%
- Cargo space- best on this row+4.2 cu ft· 22%
- Efficiencylower is better- best on this row25.3 kWh/100 mi faster· 59%
- AC charging- best on this row+3 kW· 45%
Every spec side by side
| Spec | Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT) | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Range and efficiency | ||
| Range (EPA) | no data | |
| Range (CLTC) | no data | |
| Efficiency lower is better | - best on this row | |
| Battery | ||
| Charging | ||
| Fast-charge peak | no data | |
| 10–80% charge lower is better | - best on this row | |
| Full charge at 240 V lower is better | no data | |
| AC charging | - best on this row | |
| Performance | ||
| 0–62 mph lower is better | ||
| 0–60 mph lower is better | no data | |
| Power | ||
| Torque | version not named | |
| Top speed | no data | |
| Drive | ||
| Space and size | ||
| Cargo space | - best on this row | |
| Front trunk | no data | |
| Seats | ||
| Length | ||
| Width | ||
| Height | ||
| Wheelbase | ||
| Ground clearance | no data | |
| Weight | no data | |
| Battery and warranty | ||
| Battery warranty | no data | |
| Cell chemistry | no data | |
| Equipment | ||
| Heat pump | ||
| Vehicle-to-load (V2L) | no data | |
Which one suits you?
Pick the Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT) if
Pick the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV if
Score by category
out of 100
Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT)Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
Range
79- Different test cycles - not compared.90Charging
9153Performance
6875Practicality
7690
How much is each in the US?
Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT)
- 2027 Mercedes-Benz EQS 400 4MATIC SUV
- $89,950
- EQS 400 4MATIC SUV
- $89,950
- EQS 550 4MATIC SUV
- $112,450
Questions
Which goes further on a charge?
Range
- Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT)
- CLTC
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
- EPA
- Ahead by
- Different tests
Which charges faster?
Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT)TT (银河TT)
10–80% charge
- Leader
- Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT)
- Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT)
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
- 31 min
- Ahead by
- 19 min
Which is quicker?
0–62 mph
- Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT)
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
- 5.9 scontested: sources disagree
Where next
- Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT)Full specs, prices by trim, sourcesOpen card
Compare with others
Geely Galaxy TT (银河TT) vs
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV vs
- GMC Hummer EV SUVMercedes-Benz EQS SUV is cheaper by $17,195
- Score
- 76
- Price
- from $107,145
- Genesis GV60Genesis GV60 is cheaper by $43,700
- Score
- 71
- Price
- from $46,250
- XPeng G7XPeng G7 scores 7 higher
- Score
- 81
- Price
- from CN¥195,800
- Maextro S800 (尊界S800)Maextro S800 (尊界S800) scores 7 higher
- Score
- 81
- Price
- - No US price yet
Where the numbers come from
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · 15 sources
Every source link (40)
- https://www.miit.gov.cn/jgsj/zbys/wjfb/art/2026/art_e13f1a3d60314a2ea0f6a7b91fa5732f.html
- https://price.pcauto.com.cn/s50843/config.html
- https://www.autohome.com.cn/advice/202609/1317102.html
- https://www.galaxy-geely.com/YHTT
- https://price.pcauto.com.cn/sg31323/config.html
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=50662
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=47850
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=50663
- https://www.mbusa.com/en/vehicles/build/eqs/suv
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=49690
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=46011
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=48397
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=49688
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=48396
- https://www.mbusa.com/en/vehicles/model/eqs/suv/eqs550x4
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=47852
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=47851
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=49689
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=46012
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=46010
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=48395
- https://www.mbusa.com/en/vehicles/model/eqs/suv/eqs400x4
- https://www.adac.de/rund-ums-fahrzeug/autokatalog/marken-modelle/mercedes-benz/eqs-suv/296/324571/
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=47465
- https://media.mbusa.com/releases/release-2f4468bf3e26c13ea97feb134909596b-eqs-580-4matic-suv-technical-specifications
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=48392
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/epadata/vehicles.csv
- https://www.mbusa.com/en/vehicles/class/eqs/suv
- https://www.mbusa.com/en/vehicles/model/eqs/sedan/eqs450v
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=47847
- https://www.mbusa.com/en/future-vehicles/2027-mercedes-benz-eqs-sedan
- https://www.caranddriver.com/mercedes-benz/eqs-suv/specs
- https://www.mercedesofabilene.com/research/2027-mercedes-benz-eqs-suv.htm
- https://www3.epa.gov/otaq/datafiles/FOI_VMBXT00.0ED3_APP_INI_R00.PDF
- https://www.mbusa.com/content/dam/mb-nafta/us/owners/manuals/2026/MY26%20EQ%20Warranty%20and%20Service%20Booklet_Web%20Eng_Sp.pdf
- https://www.fueleconomy.gov/ws/rest/vehicle/50662
- https://www.euroncap.com/assessments/mercedes-benz/eqs/0889/
- https://www.topgear.com/car-reviews/mercedes-benz/eqs-suv
- https://recharged.com/articles/mercedes-eqs-real-world-range-2026
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_EQS_SUV