Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) vs Škoda Enyaq
The Škoda Enyaq leads on fast-charge peak. The Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) leads on cargo space.
SUV
675km · name as listed in Chinese
No US price yet
64/100#183 of 421 · Everyday
SUV
Edition 60
United Kingdom · checked Oct 27, 2026 · skoda.co.uk
64/100#185 of 421 · Everyday
Who's ahead - and by how much?
Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)EnyaqŠkoda Enyaq
- Range
Different test cycles - not compared.
- Fast-charge peak- best on this row+93 kW· 129%
- Cargo space- best on this row+15.7 cu ft· 76%
- Power- best on this row+160 kW· 114%
- Efficiencylower is better- best on this row0.6 kWh/100 mi faster· 3%
- Top speed- best on this row+50 mph· 50%
Every spec side by side
| Spec | Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) | Škoda Enyaq |
|---|---|---|
| Range and efficiency | ||
| Range (WLTP) | no data | |
| Range (CLTC) | no data | |
| Efficiency lower is better | - best on this row | |
| Battery | ||
| Charging | ||
| Fast-charge peak | - best on this row | |
| 10–80% charge lower is better | no data | |
| AC charging | no data | |
| Performance | ||
| 0–62 mph lower is better | no data | |
| Power | - best on this row | |
| Torque | - best on this row | |
| Top speed | - best on this row | |
| Drive | ||
| Space and size | ||
| Cargo space | - best on this row | |
| Front trunk | - best on this row | |
| Seats | ||
| Length | ||
| Width | ||
| Height | ||
| Wheelbase | ||
| Battery and warranty | ||
| Battery warranty | no data | |
| Cell chemistry | no data | |
| Equipment | ||
| Heat pump | no data | |
| Vehicle-to-load (V2L) | no data | |
Which one suits you?
Pick the Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) if
Pick the Škoda Enyaq if
Score by category
out of 100
Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)Škoda Enyaq
Range
80- Different test cycles - not compared.63Charging
748Performance
57no dataPracticality
9083
How much is each in the US?
Questions
Which goes further on a charge?
Range
- Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)
- CLTC
- Škoda Enyaq
- WLTP
- Ahead by
- Different tests
Which charges faster?
Škoda EnyaqEnyaq
Fast-charge peak
- Leader
- Škoda Enyaq
- Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)
- Škoda Enyaq
- Ahead by
- 93 kW
Where next
- Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV)Full specs, prices by trim, sourcesOpen card
- Škoda EnyaqFull specs, prices by trim, sourcesOpen card
Compare with others
Fang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) vs
- Hyundai Kona ElectricFang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) scores 12 higher
- Score
- 52
- Price
- from $32,675
- Voyah DreamVoyah Dream scores 1 higher
- Score
- 65
- Price
- from €91,190
- Ford CapriFord Capri scores 1 higher
- Score
- 65
- Price
- - No US price yet
- Rolls-Royce SpectreFang Cheng Bao Titanium 7 EV (钛7 EV) scores 12 higher
- Score
- 52
- Price
- - No US price yet
Where the numbers come from
11 sources
Every source link (15)
- https://www.miit.gov.cn/jgsj/zbys/wjfb/art/2026/art_9fa19a953e2b485e8c8e8da67b207d65.html
- https://turavto.com/zh/cars/brand-1146/models/118120
- https://www.autohome.com.cn/config/spec/76557.html?from=m&platform-key=pc&pvareaid=3290231
- https://car.m.autohome.com.cn/config/series/8171.html
- https://www.evlook.com/tai7/peizhi
- https://ovi.rdw.nl/default.aspx?kenteken=GXD82H
- https://ovi.rdw.nl/default.aspx?kenteken=JKP04R
- https://ovi.rdw.nl/default.aspx?kenteken=KLP78S
- https://webapps.skoda-auto.sk/Cenniky-a-katalogy/techdata/Nova-Skoda_Enyaq_technickeudaje.pdf?202504100929=
- https://www.skoda.co.uk/_doc/c72dfee1-ab36-40e0-b1be-9c99293156c2
- https://www.skoda-auto.com/emobility/emobility-faq-charging
- https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-news/2026-skoda-enyaq-price-and-specs
- https://www.skoda-auto.com/models/range/new-enyaq
- https://www.skoda.ie/_doc/729cfa07-7e22-431e-a033-5ed7a4100e0b
- https://www.skoda.co.uk/new-cars/enyaq/enyaq-range